home/parts/PSUs/DeepCool PL550D V2 80+ Bronze 550W
/ psu · DeepCool
DeepCool · Current

DeepCool PL550D V2 80+ Bronze 550W

550W 80+ Bronze, non-modular, native 12VHPWR.

Wattage
550 W
Efficiency
80+ Bronze
Modular
Non-modular
PCIe 8-pin
3
Native 12VHPWR
Yes (1)
Warranty
5 years
> getpc engine · 44 checksrun on your build
140mm card - the engine checks it against your case, not a generic average
550W 80+ Bronze - measured against your build's real peak, transient spikes included
The last three need your other parts.Build around this part →
Check it against your build44 CHECKS · FREE · NO LOGINAdd →
India context

India V2 revision: ATX 3.1, native 12V-2x6 cable rated up to 300W. Check R-PL550D-FC0B-IN-V2 on the box; older ATX 3.0 PL550D listings are a different revision. Indicative price only; no live offer verified by this patch.

Official India stock. Full warranty through the brand's India service network, standard RMA if anything goes wrong.

/ specifications

Full specs

8 fields
BrandDeepCool
ModelPL550D V2 (R-PL550D-FC0B-IN-V2)
Wattage550 W
Efficiency Rating80+ Bronze
Modular
Form FactorATX
PCIe 5.0 / 16-pinNo
Warranty (India)5-year limited DeepCool warranty; confirm seller eligibility
/ compatible

GPUs this PSU can power

6 options
/ where_to_buy

Where to buy DeepCool PL550D V2 80+ Bronze 550W in India

Expect to pay roughly ₹3,600-4,000 for the DeepCool PL550D V2 80+ Bronze 550W in India right now, depending on offers and seller. I always recommend buying from retailers that give a proper GST invoice - it's what makes your India warranty claim smooth later.

In my years running a PC store, PrimeABGB (Mumbai) and Vedant Computers (Kolkata) have also been consistently reliable for verified stock - compare before buying.

/ common_questions

Questions

1 answers
What's the warranty in India for the DeepCool PL550D V2 80+ Bronze 550W?
5-year limited DeepCool warranty; confirm seller eligibility. This is the official Indian distributor version, which means full manufacturer warranty support.
Spotted something wrong on this page?